Registration

You are currently browsing the archive for the Registration category.

Last Names as Trademarks

Can you get trademark registration for a surname? The answer is no. There are exceptions. The rule is that the trademark examiner will refuse an application for word marks that are “primarily merely a surname.” That’s language that only a lawyer could love. But what “primarily merely a surname” means is that if a trademark registration applicant can demonstrate that a surname has a meaning or significance greater than its sound and look as a surname, the surname may be registrable. The trademark examiner will consider a number of questions about the mark to determine if the applied for mark is “primarily merely a surname”:

  1. Is the surname rare? These days at the Patent & Trademark Office (PTO), we’re talking very rare–like a steak that has been kissed by heat for just a few seconds. Recently, an examiner found 300 instances of the surname MERIWETHER, which was not considered rare. But for the name YELEY, the PTO considered 147 instances of that name in a national directory rare.
  2. Is the mark the applicant’s1 last name? Obviously, if the proposed mark is your own last name, this is strong evidence that the mark is “primarily merely a surname.”Portland Trail Blazer Travis Outlaw
  3. Does the mark have any commonly recognized meaning besides that of a surname? Marks like KNIGHT, OUTLAW or LOVE could be considered by the PTO as having a non-surname meaning. For the mark J.J. YELEY, the PTO concluded that the mark had significance as an identifier for the race car driver and not as a surname.
  4. Does the mark look and sound like a mark?2 If the applicant can convincingly argue that the mark sounds and looks like something other than a surname, then the mark may be OK for registration.

With any multi-factor test, the determination can be subjective. The bottom line is that registering surnames can be challenging, so be prepared for a surname application to be refused by the PTO.

Why does this rule exist? Many people may share a last name and it was not considered desirable to take away someone’s right to use their surname for commercial activities by having granted an exclusive trademark right to someone else. (Photo of Travis Outlaw by Keith Allison used under a Creative Commons license.)

  1. Actually, anyone with the last name connected with the applicant []
  2. Yes, this is an awful lot like the quacks like a duck, swims like a duck, looks like a duck, it must be a duck inductive reasoning test []

Tags: ,

Track Town

The Register-Guard reports on efforts by the University of Oregon in Eugene to obtain federal trademark registration for TRACK TOWN.

Tags: ,

Verbing Trademark

The New York Times has a blog entry in Gadgetwise about designing a logo.  The advice appears to be sound except for the following item:

SCOPE OUT THE COMPETITION
This is important for at least two reasons. One, you don’t want to be on the receiving end of a trademark suit. (You should also trademark your logo.) And two, you want your logo to be distinguishable from those of similar businesses. Your logo should be exactly that: yours. Of course, some companies choose to piggyback off the success of their competitors by creating similar logos, but it’s better to branch off. You should not, however, shy away from adopting elements you like. Just make yours better.

Chances are if you talk to your trademark attorney and tell him or her that you want to trademark your logo, you’ll have to endure a brief lecture about how the word “trademark” is not a verb.  The lawyadidas1er doesn’t do this to be a scold or to sound officious, but does it to help explain what exactly a trademark is.  A trademark or a service mark is a word, a graphic or a symbol that identifies the source of a product or service as separate from other sources.  A product has trademark protection once that product is delivered or used in the marketplace and consumers associate a identifying mark with that product.  It’s the use of a logo that confers trademark status, not the legal registration process.  For example, if you’re starting a sneaker company and you decide to put three vertical stripes on the sneakers to adidas-comptownidentify them as coming from your company and not Converse, the logo is not a trademark until the shoes are sold and customers recognize the stripes on the shoes as coming from Adidas.  Registering the logo, either at the state level or federally, provides additional enforcement benefits, but the registration alone doesn’t make the logo a trademark.  That’s why a logo or other mark may have the symbol ™ for unregistered trademarks or ® for registered trademarks.  Neither confer trademark status, but the trademark symbols are notification that the logo is a trademark.

So if you want to skip the lecture, ask your lawyer instead if the logo can function as a trademark, whether it’s federally registerable, or if it’s available.


Tags: , , ,

madoff-cookbook1Ruth Madoff, the wife of Bernie Madoff,  has received some attention for a cookbook she co-authored in 1996, The Great Chefs of America Cook Kosher.  The NY Times reported that she didn’t write the cookbook or even cook any of recipes and John Shoup, the CEO of Great Chefs Television, the company that has produced Great Chefs cooking shows and cookbooks, alleged that Madoff “stole the title using our registered trademark ‘Great Chefs’.  We ultimately got a cease and desist and they agreed not to reprint the bloody book.”  He also wrote that “[t]hat family evidently has some flawed morals.”

Shoup’s company, Great Chefs Television, does indeed have a registered trademark of GREAT CHEFS on the Patent and Trademark Office’s Principal Register, which serves as constructive notice to all those who might use the same mark.  Shoup’s allegations of Madoff’s moral failings, however, are excessive in light of the the fact that an author ordinarily might not believe that the use of “Great Chefs” in a cookbook title would be trademark infringement.  Here’s why:

Read the rest of this entry »