<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Known in the Marts &#187; Clearance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://knowninthemarts.com/category/trademark/clearance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://knowninthemarts.com</link>
	<description>A Blog About Trademark Law &#38;c.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 08:36:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Oregon Trademark Database</title>
		<link>http://knowninthemarts.com/2011/07/oregon-state-trademark-database/</link>
		<comments>http://knowninthemarts.com/2011/07/oregon-state-trademark-database/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 19:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Armistead</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clearance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon state trademark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knowninthemarts.com/?p=2432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The State of Oregon has made publicly available a list of active Oregon state trademark registrations. Unfortunately, the list doesn&#8217;t have descriptions of goods and services, a key element in any trademark rights analysis. The processing fee for an Oregon &#8230; <a href="http://knowninthemarts.com/2011/07/oregon-state-trademark-database/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The State of Oregon has made publicly available a <a href="http://data.oregon.gov/Business/Active-Trademark-Registrations/ny3n-dx3v" target="_blank">list</a> of active Oregon state trademark registrations. Unfortunately, the list doesn&#8217;t have descriptions of goods and services, a key element in any trademark rights analysis.</p>
<p>The processing fee for an Oregon state trademark is $50. Although an Oregon trademark doesn&#8217;t confer all the benefits of federal registration, it does have some <a href="http://www.leg.state.or.us/ors/647.html" target="_blank">benefits</a> over a common-law trademark, including trademark rights extended to the entire state without having to prove the geographical reach of your trademark use and triple damages of defendant&#8217;s profits as well as attorney&#8217;s fees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://knowninthemarts.com/2011/07/oregon-state-trademark-database/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>48 Hour Mag</title>
		<link>http://knowninthemarts.com/2010/05/48-hour-mag/</link>
		<comments>http://knowninthemarts.com/2010/05/48-hour-mag/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 04:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Armistead</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clearance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[48 Hour Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markcraftlaw.com/?p=31</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Three journalists got together and put out an issue of a magazine, from soup to nuts, in 48 hours. Accordingly, they named the endeavor 48 Hour Magazine, apparently unaware of the long-running TV show 48 Hours, owned by CBS. Not &#8230; <a href="http://knowninthemarts.com/2010/05/48-hour-mag/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://knowninthemarts.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/48HRPreview1.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-264" title="48HRPreview" src="http://markcraftlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/48HRPreview1-218x285.jpg" alt="" width="218" height="285" /></a> Three journalists got together and put out an issue of a <a href="http://48hrmag.com/">magazine</a>,  from soup to nuts, in 48 hours. Accordingly, they named the endeavor 48  Hour Magazine, apparently unaware of the long-running TV show 48 Hours,  owned by CBS. Not happy about this, CBS sent a letter demanding that the  fledgling magazine stop using its 48 Hour trademark.<span id="more-1952"></span></p>
<p>Back in the day,  a few friends making a small magazine on a photocopy machine, or a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zine">zine</a>, was restricted to  word of mouth solicitation for content and distribution to friends or  family and a few retail outlets. The zine was unlikely to get noticed by  companies that might have superior trademark rights, and even if the  zine was noticed, no one probably cared. But leveraging social media by  soliciting contributions on Twitter, and then publishing on <a href="http://magcloud.com/">MagCloud</a>,  which easily allows anyone to publish professionally looking printed  magazines sold online nationally and internationally, will  naturally attract attention.</p>
<p>The founders of 48 Hour Magazine <a href="http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/05/19/48-hr-magazine-experiment-big-hit-except-for-that-part-about-the-lawyers/http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/05/19/48-hr-magazine-experiment-big-hit-except-for-that-part-about-the-lawyers/">proclaimed</a> that they wanted &#8220;proof that it doesn’t take a bunch of money and  lawyers to  make something great.” They&#8217;re right–it doesn&#8217;t take money  and lawyers to make something great. But you do need a trademark  attorney if there&#8217;s a chance your something great is going to go out in  the world and get noticed. The reality is that people own brands of  which they are fiercely  protective, and the risk is that you&#8217;ll have to  hire a lawyer later on  to respond to and resolve the conflict. What  could have have been a  matter of a few hundred dollars to run a  trademark search upfront  becomes a matter of thousands of dollars in  attorney time to respond or  negotiate a settlement (and don&#8217;t forget  the potential of tens of  thousands of dollars it takes to defend a  lawsuit).</p>
<p>Luckily,  48  Hour Magazine found an attorney to represent them for free. But  it&#8217;s not  so lucky that they&#8217;ll lose some brand recognition and momentum  if they  have to change their identity.</p>
<p><strong>Update</strong>–48 HR magazine is having a difficult time coming up with a resolution with CBS. CBS is demanding the <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/48-hr-magazine-cbs-is-being-unreasonable-2010-6">following</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>1. CBS wants to be able to vet the  magazine&#8217;s new name.</p>
<p>2. CBS wants to  own the magazine&#8217;s existing URL, 48hrmag.com.</p>
<p>3. It&#8217;s unclear  how long the network would be willing to allow that URL to redirect to  the magazine&#8217;s yet-to-be-created new website, which Honan [a 48 HR Magazine founder] said would be  the only way to ensure continuity between the debut issue, created the  weekend of May 7, and the second issue, which they&#8217;re planning for the  end of August.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Update</strong>–48 HR <a href="http://48hrmag.com/blog/47-48-hr-magazine-sales-deadline">announced</a> that it would be publishing a similar type of magazine venture in late August and ceased all sales of its first issue as of June 27.</p>
<p><strong>Another Update</strong>–48 HR has changed its name to <a href="http://longshotmag.com/">Longshot</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://knowninthemarts.com/2010/05/48-hour-mag/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Cautionary Tale</title>
		<link>http://knowninthemarts.com/2010/03/a-cautionary-tale/</link>
		<comments>http://knowninthemarts.com/2010/03/a-cautionary-tale/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 23:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Armistead</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clearance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advanta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Altana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Avanta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark Clearance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markcraftlaw.com/?p=526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A credit union in Billings, Montana was forced to change its name of Avanta Federal Credit Union to Altana Federal Union.  When choosing its name, the credit union only checked with the state of Montana and the National Credit Union &#8230; <a href="http://knowninthemarts.com/2010/03/a-cautionary-tale/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://knowninthemarts.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Steps.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-597" title="Steps" src="http://markcraftlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Steps-285x285.jpg" alt="" width="285" height="285" /></a>A <a href="http://www.billingsgazette.net/articles/2009/06/09/news/local/24-lawsuit.prt">credit  union</a> in Billings, Montana was forced to change its name of Avanta  Federal Credit Union to Altana Federal Union.  When choosing its name,  the credit union only checked with the state of Montana and the National  Credit Union Association, but failed to obtain an opinion from a  trademark attorney regarding the availability of the name.  As a  consequence, the credit union must spend about $80,000 to change all its  stationary and signs after Advanta Bank in Utah objected to the  similarly sounding and spelled mark.</p>
<p>The Gazette article notes that Avanta and Advanta are &#8220;neological&#8221;  names.  While it&#8217;s true that coined or fanciful marks can be good  choices for trademarks, both of these appear to be closely derivative of  the word &#8216;advantage&#8217;.  Chances are if you&#8217;ve thought of a form of  &#8216;advantage&#8217;, so has someone else, which increases the chances that your  new brand may be infringing a prior trademark use. <em>Originally  published June 19, 2009.</em></p>
<p><strong>Update</strong>: unfortunately, Advanta&#8217;s efforts to protect its brand  couldn&#8217;t prevent it from going on the FDIC&#8217;s<a href="http://www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/advanta-ut.html"> failed bank list</a>.</p>
<p><em></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://knowninthemarts.com/2010/03/a-cautionary-tale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

